[H-GEN] Room Bookings Update

Matthew Franklin matheist76 at westnet.com.au
Wed Jan 14 02:40:50 EST 2009


Res wrote:
> [ Humbug *General* list - semi-serious discussions about Humbug and     ]
> [ Unix-related topics. Posts from non-subscribed addresses will vanish. ]
>
> On Wed, 14 Jan 2009, Clinton Roy wrote:
>
>   
>> * does not wear shoes
>>     
>
> Your kidding, is this really a concern to you? So long as the feet are 
> clean who really cares? (however this could be an OHS issue)
>
> I aggree. 
>> * does not use soap
>>     
>
> No arguments there
>
>   
>> * goes to sleep during meetings
>>     
>
> C'mon, you mean you've NEVER gone to sleep or dozed in a boring meeting, 
> any meeting?
>
>   
>> * tries to electrocute/burn/explode/implode oneself
>>     
>
> There are special wards at most hospitals for those types of people
>
>   
>> * displaying objectionable material
>>     
>
> This is a problem, who decides what is objectionable? What offends one may 
> not another, it is up to the viewer of said content, so long as the content
> does not blatantly break laws it should not be an issue, just look at the 
> arguments with relation to this with that twit idiot senator Conroy.
>
>   
>> I would propose a warning system, three strikes and your out. Each
>>     
>
> I'd agree with that, almost (see next)
>
>   
>> strike should be decided on by an exec member. Three strikes means
>> expulsion from the club for at least a year.
>>     
>
> Three strikes, the offender should have to present themselves before at 
> least 3 un-related members of the exec, and show why they shouldn't be 
> kicked out, if they can't satisfy 2 or all execs, out they go, majority 
> decides, democracy and all.
>
>
>   

The main problem is explicit material being shown. So remove porn etc 
from desktop and screen savers.  I really don't have an issue with 
people provided they don't stink the place up.




More information about the General mailing list