[H-GEN] F-king CVS!
Raymond Smith
raymonds at uq.net.au
Thu Jul 8 02:22:30 EDT 1999
(Note reply-to: being general at humbug.org.au vs Raymond Smith <raymonds at uq.net.au>)
On Thu, 8 Jul 1999, Marshall, Joshua wrote:
> Yes, it is normal that the ,v files are read-only. The locking is set in
> the ,v files themselves.
Gottcha.
> To unlock file 6521.C:
>
> cvs admin -u 6521.C
>
> OR edit the "locks" line out and the line below it.
Gottcha.
It turns out that somehow a file has been removed from the repository and
when we run a recursive unlock through the whole module cvs dies when it
can't find this file. Naturally, this file is one of the first in the
whole tree :-).
I am wondering why CVS is held up as such a great version control system.
I have had a great many problems with branches and tags (perhaps Jason
could enlighten me?). Someone, I think it might have been Andrae, was
saying that they tried CVS with Linux but found it to be a poor choice.
Any comments? Is there anyone on the list using CVS for large projects?
Raymond
---
raymond at humbug.org.au The early bird catches the worm,
but the second mouse eats the cheese
--
This is list (humbug) general handled by majordomo at lists.humbug.org.au .
Postings only from subscribed addresses of lists general or general-post.
More information about the General
mailing list