[H-GEN] Re: [H-ANNOUNCE] Constitutional amendments
Robert Brockway
robert at zen.humbug.org.au
Wed Jun 24 11:20:15 EDT 1998
On Tue, 23 Jun 1998, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Why?
It is because I have never felt comfortable with the idea of allowing one
person to get more than one vote. If A proxies to B, B will vote the way
B wants to vote but get 2 votes in doing so, B will not (imho :) vote the
way 'A would have voted' with one of them. Of couse it could be argued
that A will choose a like minded person to proxy to, but this is
subjective.
Imho the
> We're a computer user group; surely it's not beyond us to realise that
> physical presence isn't always a crucial factor.
That is true. I would, for example, be happier with voting via
teleconferencing rather than the current proxy scheme. Teleconferencing
would be more representative of 'not being there in a physical sense on in
an intellectual sense' than proxying.
To be honest I can't even remember why we put it in there :) Can anyone
remember?
Cheers,
-Robert
--Robert Brockway B.Sc. Email: robert at zen.humbug.org.au, robert at icc.net.au
r.brockway at uq.edu.au
WWW: http://www.humbug.org.au/~robert
Immediate Past President of HUMBUG (http://www.humbug.org.au)
More information about the General
mailing list