[H-SASIG] Proposed changes to Excalibur

[Mark Suter]

Folks,	

FWIW, I have no objections to any of the proposals and offer this	
comment on the sshd port issue:	

   Running sshd on a port other than 22 does offer a little peace	
   from the script kiddies that keep hitting port 22; however, it	
   doesn't otherwise help security.	

   I wrote http://zwitterion.org/software/ssh-https-tunnel/ to	
   permit SSH to ports 443 and 563 via the UQ proxies, so port	
   563 might be a better choice and 24.	

   Sshd will happily run on multiple ports for a transition	
   period, for example, 22, 24 and 563.  This would all the	
   impact to be immediately judged.	

--	
Mark Suter	
Humbug Past President	
http://www.humbug.org.au/	
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 255 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.humbug.org.au/pipermail/sasig/attachments/20091130/76ef864c/attachment.sig>