No subject

>From suter  Fri Nov 30 13:46:40 2001
Return-Path: <majordom at caliburn.humbug.org.au>
Received: from diadora.client.uq.net.au (diadora-2 [10.0.1.2])
	by zwitterion.humbug.org.au (8.12.1/8.12.1/Debian -2) with ESMTP id fAU3keNT014771
	for <suter at zwitterion.humbug.org.au>; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 13:46:40 +1000
Received: from caliburn (mail at caliburn.humbug.org.au [203.15.51.6])
	by diadora.client.uq.net.au (8.12.1/8.12.1/Debian -2) with ESMTP id fAU3ke05009879
	for <suter at zwitterion.humbug.org.au>; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 13:46:40 +1000
Received: from majordom by caliburn with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 169eEJ-00004w-00
	for <general-outgoing at lists.humbug.org.au>; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 13:20:47 +1000
Received: from fox.uq.net.au
	([203.101.255.1] helo=uq.net.au ident=root)
	by caliburn with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 169eEH-0008WV-00
	for <general at lists.humbug.org.au>; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 13:20:45 +1000
Received: from localhost (zzrasmit at localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by uq.net.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA21786
	for <general at lists.humbug.org.au>; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 13:20:44 +1000 (GMT+1000)
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 13:20:44 +1000 (GMT+1000)
From: Raymond Smith <zzrasmit at uqconnect.net>
X-Sender:  <zzrasmit at fox.uq.net.au>
To: <general at lists.humbug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [H-GEN] caching nameserver 
In-Reply-To: <nospam-1007089628.54469 at bambi.gbch.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.4.30.0111301317200.24481-100000 at fox.uq.net.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: general at lists.humbug.org.au
X-Loop: general at lists.humbug.org.au
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo at lists.humbug.org.au?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:general at lists.humbug.org.au>
List-Subscribe: <mailto: general-request at lists.humbug.org.au?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: semi-serious discussions about Humbug and Unix-related topics <general at lists.humbug.org.au>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto: general-request at lists.humbug.org.au?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://archive.humbug.org.au/humbug-general/>
Sender: Majordomo <majordom at caliburn.humbug.org.au>
Status: RO
Content-Length: 1332
Lines: 35

[ Humbug *General* list - semi-serious discussions about Humbug and  ]
[ Unix-related topics.  Please observe the list's charter.           ]
[ Worthwhile understanding: http://www.humbug.org.au/netiquette.html ]

On Fri, 30 Nov 2001, Greg Black wrote:
>
> I, together with many other people, have been using djbdns on
> various networks for ages and have nothing but praise for it.
> That's actual experience, not somebody spreading FUD, which is
> what you appear to be doing with your post.
>
> If you have specific issues with djbdns, take them to the djbdns
> mailing list and let people address your concerns.

Does djbdns now properly implement zone transfers? When I last looked
around I had thought this was not the case; perhaps I am confusing it for
some other system.

As far as BIND 9 goes... I had no troubles with it.I think I last used
9.1.3. I did have some very fucking wierd problems with zone transfers but
I blamed them on the weird routing supplied by my former employer's IS
people.

Cheers,

Raymond
---
raymond at humbug.org.au   Just once, I'd like to quote someone famous in
			my .sig and spell their name right -- Mi.


--
* This is list (humbug) general handled by majordomo at lists.humbug.org.au .
* Postings to this list are only accepted from subscribed addresses of
* lists 'general' or 'general-post'.