[H-GEN] Room Bookings Update
Robert Brockway
robert at timetraveller.org
Tue Jan 13 23:36:04 EST 2009
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009, Arjen Lentz wrote:
> These days everybody has a computer, and Internet. Most just use it,
> and don't care that much about what's going on inside.
> SOME will have some hassles with how things work and need a bit of
> help, and a FEW will want to dig more and see what makes it tick.
Very true. Clubs will get a mix of the super-hard-core, students starting
out and other random individuals I guess.
> HUMBUG is about the latter two, I would think. But do remember where
> THEY come from (as opposed to where WE [the old hands] come from), as
> it's different worlds entirely.
I remember the Internet before NAT[1]. I'm not the only one around here.
[1] This comes to mind as I was reflecting recently on a discussion on
AusNOG about the use of NAT under IPv6 and it occured to me that a lot of
the participants in the discussion had never known the Internet without
NAT being common.
>> As far as I can remember we have always been Windows
>> hostile. Seems reasonable to me, as we are essentially an
>> open source club.
>
> It does not seem reasonable to me at all.
> a) there are a lots of OSS apps and tools for the Windows platform.
> Think Firefox and OpenOffice, to keep it very very simple.
> b) anyone even remotely interested in running an OSS OS will 99.99%
> certainly be running Windows now. Being self-rightious geek
> smartypants who feel that OS choice is a religion that anyone in the
> real world actually cares about, may not be the most inspirational
> approach or yielding the best results.
>
> c) if they are running Windows now, getting them to try some OSS
> stuff on Windows first is actually a very good approach, rather than
This is an approach endorsed by Software Freedom Day. A lot of the cdroms
given out on SFD have OSS s/w for MS-Windows.
> Having a box of Ubuntu CDs handy (ordered from shipit,ubuntu.com)
> might be good. Apart from being very kind to simple users (with liveCD
> and installer combined), if you stick the CD into a Windows box it
> also contains some of the most common OSS stuff for Windows; so it's
> all-in-one. Naturally, some among you will insist that Ubuntu sucks
> and brand Y is clearly better and must be used, however I would
Ubuntu sucks - brand Y is clearly better and must be used!
Oh sorry, got carried away there.
Actually I like Ubuntu for the desktop :)
Rob
--
I tried to change the world but they had a no-return policy
More information about the General
mailing list