[H-GEN] ext2 or ext3

Jason Henry Parker jasonp at uq.net.au
Wed Jun 19 08:13:39 EDT 2002


[ Humbug *General* list - semi-serious discussions about Humbug and     ]
[ Unix-related topics. Posts from non-subscribed addresses will vanish. ]

Ben Fowler <fowlerb at optushome.com.au> writes:

> The benefits of using a journalled filesystem are fairly well-known:
> it can dramatically cut down on the time to fsck your disks upon
> startup, since instead of running a full fsck, it merely reconciles
> the volume journal.

Some of the ext3 changelog messages are *truly* scary.  XFS has been
around for a *long* time and beyond the added complexity (though to be
honest I don't recall if XFS or LVM was more complex) I can't see any
reason to use ext3 instead of it.

> One the whole though, I think that making use of a journalled
> filesystem, if available is a good idea.

I don't think journalling is necessarily useful in all situations, and
in any event most journalled FSes only journal metadata, so I'm unsure
of the utility.  Suggestions, anyone?
-- 
||----|---|------------|--|-------|------|-----------|-#---|-|--|------||
| Jason's going-away do:  June 23, 2pm, Guyatt Park:                    |
| http://bigmeanie.net/bbq-annc.html                   jasonp at uq.net.au |
||--|--------|--------------|----|-------------|------|---------|-----|-|

--
* This is list (humbug) general handled by majordomo at lists.humbug.org.au .
* Postings to this list are only accepted from subscribed addresses of
* lists 'general' or 'general-post'.  See http://www.humbug.org.au/



More information about the General mailing list