[H-GEN] any ideas for cluster filesystem solution ?

Grant, Luke LGrant at seven.com.au
Thu Nov 9 05:10:48 EST 2000


[ Humbug *General* list - semi-serious discussions about Humbug and  ]
[ Unix-related topics.  Please observe the list's charter.           ]
[ Worthwhile understanding: http://www.humbug.org.au/netiquette.html ]

Check out the new Cisco 4080 Switch. It has suppors in the OS for active
clustering.

you gotta plug em into a hub right? So make it do the work for you.

Luke

--------------------------------------------
Luke Grant
Systems Administrator
Seven Queensland.
Maroochydore
140-142 Horton Pde.
wk#  +61754301737
mob# +61407317951
-------------------------------------------

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric HORNSBY [mailto:e.hornsby at mailbox.uq.edu.au]
> Sent: Wednesday, 8 November 2000 22:30
> To: general at lists.humbug.org.au
> Subject: [H-GEN] any ideas for cluster filesystem solution ?
> 
> 
> [ Humbug *General* list - semi-serious discussions about Humbug and  ]
> [ Unix-related topics.  Please observe the list's charter.           ]
> [ Worthwhile understanding: http://www.humbug.org.au/netiquette.html ]
> 
> Hi all
> 
> Here's what I'm trying to do:
> 
> I have two RedHat Linux boxes that connect to the same Fibre Channel
> RAID array.  They are both webservers in a basic cluster - with a
> heartbeat between them to provide for IP address takeover if 
> one fails.
> 
> What I would really like is for them to both be able to serve webpages
> from the same filesystem on the array - preferably without a 
> single point
> of failure.  I've looked a bit at using NFS and also CODA, but neither
> seems quite right.  The RAID hardware I'm using doesn't seem to have
> the DLOCK support needed for GFS.
>  
> I've tried just having an ext2 filesystem on the array
> with one server mounting it readonly, but any updates made by 
> the other
> server are not visible to the readonly server until apache is 
> stopped and
> restarted (with the array umounted and re-mounted in 
> between)...there must
> be a better way...this is not so good because the web pages 
> are updated
> every half hour or so from a staging server using rsync over ssh.
> 
> I'm looking for ideas...any suggestions, war-stories etc would be
> very welcome. 
> 
> thanks for your time
> Eric
> 
> 
> --
> * This is list (humbug) general handled by 
> majordomo at lists.humbug.org.au .
> * Postings to this list are only accepted from subscribed addresses of
> * lists 'general' or 'general-post'.
> 

--
* This is list (humbug) general handled by majordomo at lists.humbug.org.au .
* Postings to this list are only accepted from subscribed addresses of
* lists 'general' or 'general-post'.



More information about the General mailing list