[H-GEN] kerberos or nis+

[craig Armour]

[ Humbug *General* list - semi-serious discussions about Humbug and ]
[ Unix-related topics.  Please observe the list's charter.          ]

> Kerberos support as far as I can tell under Linux isn't too crash hot, but
> it's fairly well supported under OpenBSD. Whereas NIS+ is the opposite.

actualy... kerberos support under linux is very good.  try the ebones
distribution (kerberos V4) ( url from you local friendly search engine
).  or you can suck down the kerberos 5 rpm's from
your.local.friendly.redhat.mirror.

on the other hand... I would have though nis+ was pretty poor under
linux. *shrug*

nis vs nis+ is alot simpler to setup on the server side as an aside and
*is* supported by linux fairly well ( if not a little borked )

cheers
Craig
-- 
Craig Armour			c.armour at arts.uq.edu.au
System Administrator    	 Joyce Ackroyd Building 
Language Lab, University of Queensland   phone 33656916

--
* This is list (humbug) general handled by majordomo at lists.humbug.org.au .
* Postings to this list are only accepted from subscribed addresses of
* lists 'general' or 'general-post'.