[H-GEN] SETI at home
Martin Pool
martinp at mincom.com
Mon Jul 26 19:40:08 EDT 1999
(Note reply-to: being general at humbug.org.au vs Martin Pool <martinp at mincom.com>)
Robert Brockway wrote:
>
> "Patrick Nichols" <pat at humbug.org.au> wrote:
> : (Note reply-to: being general at humbug.org.au vs "Patrick Nichols" <pat at humbug.org.au>)
>
> : Correct me if I am wrong, but doesn't seti use up inordinate amounts of ram
It also uses much more bandwidth to download units-of-work, because it
needs to download raw data to crunch rather than just being told a range
of keys. I think blocks are ~400kB and take a day or so to process.
Perhaps they could use a more efficient format but since the data is
essentially random it can't be compressed. This may be a problem if
you're concerned about volume or connection time charges.
> It uses bit of ram but so far it hasn't bothered me as it still only runs
> wutn the box is idle (I have it set to nice 20).
As others pointed out a nice 20 process will still use a few percent of
the processor even when it's busy with nice 0 tasks. You can always
kill it if you need more power and restart it later.
--
Martin
--
This is list (humbug) general handled by majordomo at lists.humbug.org.au .
Postings only from subscribed addresses of lists general or general-post.
More information about the General
mailing list