[H-GEN] A problem...

[Frank Brand]

R Bubko wrote:
> 
> Byron Ellacott wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 14, 1998 at 01:08:27AM +1000, Robert Brockway wrote:
> > > a)  Return the pa2012 and go for an inferior TX based m/b (TX can only
> > >     cache 64Mb afaiK). [HX based boards don't support sdram].
> 
> The TX option for a 'Real Use' machine which needs larger memory sounds
> inferior to using the older HX chipset with lots of EDOram even though
> it is slower but the chipset does cache it completely. Also an older HX
> board would have price advantages over the newer 'good quality' SDRAM
> with the true 100MHz bus capabilities. (Much cheaper I believe).

May not be EDO is usually dearer than SDRAM and it might surprise you
how much a HX board will cost.

> Ultimately the choice in my view is:

-- 
Frank Brand
E-mail: fbrand at uq.net.au
Homepage: http://www.uq.net.au/~zzfbrand

----------------------- HUMBUG General List --------------------------------
echo "unsubscribe general" | mail majordomo at humbug.org.au # To Unsubscribe