[H-GEN] personal organiser
Paul Gearon
gearon at computer.org
Fri Apr 24 00:48:22 EDT 1998
> From: Charlie Allom <yeld at pobox.com>
> Hiyas
>
> i dont know whether this is appropriate or not, but everyone else seems to
> be doing it ;)
Probably not appropriate, but it doesn't bother me.
> I'm looking to buy myself a personal organiser along the liunes or an
> apple newton/palm pilot/winCE device. does anyone know where to get a
> deal, or to get a good second hand one?
Can't offer much advice here (though I wish I could).
> and of course i am looking for advice on the best type to get.
> i would prefer the newton for all the capacity for cool toys i can put on
> there =)
OK, the following is admittedly a little subjective, but
I'll try to stick to the facts...
Apple Newtons
The Newtons certainly are _very_ good. The thing I
particularly like about them is their handwriting
recognition / spell-checker and it's ability to adapt this
to the user.
The major problems with these are the fact that they are so
large and bulky (you need a very big pocket to fit one in -
and no "Is that a Newton in your pocket or are you just
pleased to see me" jokes please), and also Apple are no
longer making them. They also cost much more than the
other 2 machines.
Some of the big pluses I know of include the sheer
processing power available, and the availability of
software. These things really are a hand sized computer,
and a lot of fun to use.
MS WinCE
I wouldn't buy a wince if you paid me. True, some do have
colour screens, and they come with a PCMCIA slot, but
that's where the benefits end. I'll start with ergonomics.
They have a stylus, but only to replace the mouse, and
using the stylus AND a keyboard isn't convenient (and
convenience is the whole reason behind these machines).
This brings me to the point that they are awkward to hold
in comparison with the other 2 boxes.
Some of these issues have been addressed by the
introduction of the Palm-Sized-PC (whose name MS had to
change from PalmPC due to similarity with the PalmPilot
name - it's not surprising they were caught out for this as
even a cursory look at the Palm-Sized-PC shows that it is
a BLATANT rip-off of the PalmPilot design). The
Palm-Sized-PC comes with hand-writing recognition (of what
level I can't say) and is much easier to hold than the
other wince boxes.
However, the real problems with wince are in the OS. For
starters, it's a cut-down Win95. That should tell you
enough, but in case it doesn't... Wince requires 2MB just
for the OS and each program takes up hundreds of KB. They
are NOT efficient in their usage of space. Also, they
require a special version of MS Visual C++ to compile
programs for them, and this is _not_ free. This leads to
the majority of software being written by companies rather
than hackers, which means that there is less of it, and a
lot of it isn't free. It also leads to the programs being
bloated (This shouldn't surprise anyone who has worked with
MS VC++). I have also been hearing rumours that the
platform can crash a lot. This may or may not be true, but
since the OS is based on Win95 I would suspect that it is.
PalmPilot.
This is the only one I would consider against the Newton.
Since it is so much cheaper it was also the organiser which
I bought for myself. It's main advantages are it's size,
price and availability of software and peripherals. Unlike
the wince boxes it makes extremely efficient use of it's
RAM. I currently have 19 applications installed, plus all
of my addresses, appointments and numerous notes and I am
using 651K out of a possible 960K. Compare this to a
minimal wince configuration of 2MB ROM and 3MB RAM (IIRC).
The PalmPilot comes in 4 flavours: PalmPilot Personal;
PalmPilot 5000; PalmPilot Professional and PalmIII. I
opted away from the first 2 as they have no PPP support.
Also the "Personal" doesn't have a back-lit screen.
Fortunately, each model can be upgraded to a higher model
for about the cost difference between the 2. The PalmIII
also comes with an IR port (as does the Newton). The other
models can have this installed easily. Upgrades are also
available from 3rd parties, some of which are much better
than the original 3Com parts (or simply not available form
3Com).
The biggest advantage I find with the PalmPilot is the free
development tools, and hence the HUGE support base for
these devices. There are extensive tools for programming
these things under Windows, Solaris, Debian and RedHat,
just to name a few. There is even a Java VM available for
it. This has led to large number of mostly free programs
which can run on this platform.
Well, most of this has been reasonably biased (particularly
towards the PalmPilot), but I hope I shed some light on
what I know about these devices. Basically the PalmPilot
and wince are the best for price and future support. The
Newton and the PalmPilot are more efficient and easier to
use (in my opinion) while wince is aimed at providing a
familiar environment for Windows users (ref. MSJ Oct 1996).
Hopefully no-one here requires that last benefit. Also,
the PalmPilot seems to have the best support base IMHO,
much in the same way that Linux does (as it is an open
system).
Paul Gearon
gearon at computer.org
Microsoft - Where every morning is the dawn of a new error.
----------------------- HUMBUG General List --------------------------------
echo "unsubscribe general" | mail majordomo at humbug.org.au # To Unsubscribe
More information about the General
mailing list