Bad experiences with distros (was Re: [H-GEN] CRUX (A programmers linux distro))
Matthew Sellers
msellers at bigpond.com
Fri Aug 6 11:52:58 EDT 2004
On Fri, 06 Aug 2004 21:03:14 +1000
Greg Black <gjb at gbch.net> wrote:
> On 2004-08-06, Matthew Sellers wrote:
> > Greg Black <gjb at gbch.net> wrote:
> >
> > > I have played with Debian installs, but abandoned it once I
> > > had determined that Debian did not have support for the
> > > hardware I wanted it to run on. Since then, I've stuck with
> > > BSD variants.
> >
> > Could you please clarify this; what hardware advantages do you get from
> > BSDs? I would be interested to know.
>
> I don't understand the question. What part of "Debian did not
> have support for the hardware I wanted it to run on" requires
> clarification?
I was wondering whether it was the base architecture[1] or certain types of
peripherals that were not supported. Or maybe just because Debian stable is
almost always older than most other stable distributions.
Essentially it was the "hardware" part that I wanted to know about. I had
thought that most deployments would have been chosen on OS features rather than
hardware support issues.
[1] I believe that Debian has not been ported to stone circles as of yet. The
druidic community much preferring the long standing RUNIX operating system.
--
Matthew Sellers
More information about the General
mailing list