[H-GEN] Linux Backup
David Jericho
david.jericho at bytecomm.com.au
Fri May 9 02:55:12 EDT 2003
[ Humbug *General* list - semi-serious discussions about Humbug and ]
[ Unix-related topics. Posts from non-subscribed addresses will vanish. ]
On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 02:22:44AM -0400, Robert Brockway wrote:
> backup you can lose considerably more than that. In the end it is risk
> assessment but I've seen far too many tapes (and drives) return errors to
> feel comfortable software compressing to tape.
Same could be said about CDs, hard drives, and other backup media I
can think of.
> On the whole I've gone off tapes as a backup solution anyway. Too many
> problems overall.
Not that I'm defending tape, but the problem appears to be there is no
better solution.
After what's probably half a century of using tape, the ins and outs
of tape are well known.
> Interfacing zip with dump or tar to get the desired result is left as an
> exercise for the reader.
I feel using zip or the like to do an individual file is a bit weak as
well. If one file gets corrupted, it's probably that 160MB autocad
image. Of course, you can quite successfully argue that you minimise the
chances of a particular file being corrupted because it's compressed.
--
David Jericho
--
Scanned and found clear of viruses by EntireScan. http://www.entirescan.com/
--
* This is list (humbug) general handled by majordomo at lists.humbug.org.au .
* Postings to this list are only accepted from subscribed addresses of
* lists 'general' or 'general-post'. See http://www.humbug.org.au/
More information about the General
mailing list