[H-GEN] Priorities
Nick Kwiatkowski
nickolas at au1.ibm.com
Fri Jun 6 00:06:12 EDT 2003
[ Humbug *General* list - semi-serious discussions about Humbug and ]
[ Unix-related topics. Posts from non-subscribed addresses will vanish. ]
On Thu, 6 Jun 2003, Robert Brockway wrote:
>> What is the logic behind negative nice values having higher priorities
>> than positive ones? At first glance it seems a bit backwards, but I'm
>> sure there must be a good (and unknown to me) reason for it.
>>
>> In fact how come they range from -20 to +19, why not 0-39 ?
>
> I'm reasonably sure that originally nice values were only positive and
> that negative nice values were only added later. So I guess it could be
> seen as historical.
Yup, Rob is quite correct. The original range values were 0 to 39 with the
default value being 20 [1]. Some Un*x versions still use that format....AIX
:)
Ciao,
Nik
[1] "The Magic Garden Explained - The internals of Unix System V Release
4", Berny Goodheart, James Cox.
Nickolas Kwiatkowski
IT Architect
AMS Solutions Enablement (ASE)
Application Management Services
IBM Global Services Australia
phone: 07 3887 6304, mobile: 0412 121 276, email: nickolas at au1.ibm.com
"In the middle of difficulty lies opportunity" - Albert Einstein
--
* This is list (humbug) general handled by majordomo at lists.humbug.org.au .
* Postings to this list are only accepted from subscribed addresses of
* lists 'general' or 'general-post'. See http://www.humbug.org.au/
More information about the General
mailing list