[H-GEN] Re: No SIGUP for xinetd?

[Robert Brockway]

[ Humbug *General* list - semi-serious discussions about Humbug and     ]
[ Unix-related topics. Posts from non-subscribed addresses will vanish. ]

On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Tony Nugent wrote:

> It is a pity that xinetd (or inetd) can't be configured to run
> different sets of services on a per-level basis (the daemon is
> either running with the same set of services, or not running).

It could be done.  The config file could be replaced on a per-runlevel
basis by the use of ln -sf.

Unix flexibility saves the day again :)

> (Interesting... someone recently mentioned runlevels 7-9, chkconfig
> doesn't handle that at all:)

They are one of the best kept non-secrets in Linux :)

Rob

-- 
Robert Brockway B.Sc. email: robert at timetraveller.org  ICQ: 104781119
Linux counter project ID #16440 (http://counter.li.org)
"The earth is but one country and mankind its citizens" -Baha'u'llah

--
* This is list (humbug) general handled by majordomo at lists.humbug.org.au .
* Postings to this list are only accepted from subscribed addresses of
* lists 'general' or 'general-post'.  See http://www.humbug.org.au/