[H-GEN] On SpamAssassin and email
David Starkoff
dbs at uq.net.au
Fri Nov 22 07:59:57 EST 2002
[ Humbug *General* list - semi-serious discussions about Humbug and ]
[ Unix-related topics. Posts from non-subscribed addresses will vanish. ]
At 2002-11-22T19:26+1000, Robert Brockway wrote:
> It occured to me while reading about TMDA that most spam would be
> stopped dead in its tracks just by accepting mail only from people
> already in your address book[2] or another home grown whitelist. I
> wondered why this had never occured to me before.
The religious merits of TMDA as an anti-spam solution were the subject
of a somewhat extended discussion on the Gnus development list (i.e.,
ding). I seem to recall that TMDA could interface with BBDB and thus
not require address validation for addresses in the database.
<http://www.gnus.org/list-archives/ding/200111/msg00115.html>
<http://www.gnus.org/list-archives/ding/200111/msg00118.html>
Then again, I could be completely mistaken. I've never tried it.
David.
--
"At least that's what we thought until we added the floppy hat of
research to our flared pants-suit of investigation and discovered
the classy look of truth."
--
* This is list (humbug) general handled by majordomo at lists.humbug.org.au .
* Postings to this list are only accepted from subscribed addresses of
* lists 'general' or 'general-post'. See http://www.humbug.org.au/
More information about the General
mailing list