[H-GEN] Experiences with SpamAssassin
Robert Stanford
rob at rotapile.com
Fri Nov 22 03:41:49 EST 2002
[ Humbug *General* list - semi-serious discussions about Humbug and ]
[ Unix-related topics. Posts from non-subscribed addresses will vanish. ]
On Fri, 2002-11-22 at 17:26, Greg Black wrote:
> To get an idea of performance (both speed and accuracy), I fed
> spamc an archive of known email. It took 14 hours to process
> the test archive on a lightly-loaded Celeron-366 with 384 Mbytes
> of RAM -- that's about 0.6 seconds/message.
I just installed it on a rented box in the states running RH6.2, it
serves aorund 300 domains.
I simply installed it through CPAN, then added
:0 fw
| spamc
:0
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
! spambox at ourdomain.com
to /etc/procmailrc
And fired up spamd.
The box is a PIII-550 with 1Gb ram and we're picking up between 300 and
700 spams a day. All I can say is brilliant.
--
¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤
Robert Stanford
º¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤º
--
* This is list (humbug) general handled by majordomo at lists.humbug.org.au .
* Postings to this list are only accepted from subscribed addresses of
* lists 'general' or 'general-post'. See http://www.humbug.org.au/
More information about the General
mailing list