[H-GEN] Compressing ISO images (Was: Darwin ?)

Robert Brockway robert at timetraveller.org
Sun May 26 02:48:26 EDT 2002

[ Humbug *General* list - semi-serious discussions about Humbug and     ]
[ Unix-related topics. Posts from non-subscribed addresses will vanish. ]

On Sun, 26 May 2002, Greg Black wrote:

> In one case, the compression was hardly worth the effort, but in
> the second case it made a significant difference.  Also, it's
> worth noting that bzip2, despite being /much/ slower than gzip,
> sometimes does worse than gzip and sometimes does marginally

Bzip2 can also do much better than gzip, but as you'd expect it depends on 
the type of data (as the algorithms have different approaches).  Bzip2 is 
computationally heavier so it definately slower :)

Also worth noting that bzip2 defaults to -9 while gzip defaults to -6 (but 
Greg did have both explicitely set to -9 in his tests).


-- Robert Brockway B.Sc. email: robert at timetraveller.org  ICQ: 104781119
   Linux counter project ID #16440 (http://counter.li.org)
   blake: up 1 day,  3:50,  4 users,  load average: 0.49, 0.47, 0.61
   "The earth is but one country and mankind its citizens" -Baha'u'llah

* This is list (humbug) general handled by majordomo at lists.humbug.org.au .
* Postings to this list are only accepted from subscribed addresses of
* lists 'general' or 'general-post'.  See http://www.humbug.org.au/

More information about the General mailing list