[H-GEN] ext2 or ext3

Christopher Biggs chris at stallion.oz.au
Tue Jun 18 01:40:52 EDT 2002


[ Humbug *General* list - semi-serious discussions about Humbug and     ]
[ Unix-related topics. Posts from non-subscribed addresses will vanish. ]

Robert Kearey <mammal at optushome.com.au> moved upon the face of the 'Net and spake thusly:

> Shaun Nykvist wrote:
>
>> [...]I had a colleague
>> trying to convince me that ext3 was a better way to go 
>
> Your colleague is correct. A journalled filesystem is always nicer to
> have around than un anjournalled one. 

Except when it's buggy.  But I think it's safe to say that most of the
bugs have shaken out of ext3 by now.

Anyone else remember the early days of the SCO HTFS (aka "Low Reliability
File System")?   Blecch.

--cjb

-- 
 Christopher J Biggs \ chris at stallion.oz.au \ Vice-Pope Torture & Indulgences
 Stallion Technologies\ Brisbane,  Australia \   Holy Church of Givashitology
 nordfordfnrdfnodfnorfnordnordfordfnrdfnodfnorfnordnordfordfnrdfnodfnorfnordn

--
* This is list (humbug) general handled by majordomo at lists.humbug.org.au .
* Postings to this list are only accepted from subscribed addresses of
* lists 'general' or 'general-post'.  See http://www.humbug.org.au/



More information about the General mailing list