[H-GEN] ext2 or ext3
Scott Pullen
spullen at optusnet.com.au
Tue Jun 18 00:34:36 EDT 2002
[ Humbug *General* list - semi-serious discussions about Humbug and ]
[ Unix-related topics. Posts from non-subscribed addresses will vanish. ]
My understanding is that ext3 'just' adds journalling so that the
filesystem is more fault tolerant. This adds a little overhead but
there are less problems with a restart after losing power etc.
Implementing it on install is no problem so I guess my question is why not?
Cheers,
Scott.
> been using ext2 on my redhat boxen for quite some time (before the
> hard drive crashed - didn't lose any data though so I am pleased in
> that sense), however, after this crash I had a colleague trying to
> convince me that ext3 was a better way to go - can someone enlighten
> me with any pluses or minuses to using this type of file system???
--
* This is list (humbug) general handled by majordomo at lists.humbug.org.au .
* Postings to this list are only accepted from subscribed addresses of
* lists 'general' or 'general-post'. See http://www.humbug.org.au/
More information about the General
mailing list