[H-GEN] ext2 or ext3

Scott Pullen spullen at optusnet.com.au
Tue Jun 18 00:34:36 EDT 2002


[ Humbug *General* list - semi-serious discussions about Humbug and     ]
[ Unix-related topics. Posts from non-subscribed addresses will vanish. ]

My understanding is that ext3 'just' adds journalling so that the 
filesystem is more fault tolerant.  This adds a little overhead but 
there are less problems with a restart after losing power etc.

Implementing it on install is no problem so I guess my question is why not?

Cheers,

Scott.

>  been using ext2 on my redhat boxen for quite some time (before the 
> hard drive crashed - didn't lose any data though so I am pleased in 
> that sense), however, after this crash I had a colleague trying to 
> convince me that ext3 was a better way to go - can someone enlighten 
> me with any pluses or minuses to using this type of file system???




--
* This is list (humbug) general handled by majordomo at lists.humbug.org.au .
* Postings to this list are only accepted from subscribed addresses of
* lists 'general' or 'general-post'.  See http://www.humbug.org.au/



More information about the General mailing list