[H-GEN] WEB PAGES - PERMISSION REFUSED
Greg Black
gjb at humbug.org.au
Wed Feb 27 06:04:53 EST 2002
[ Humbug *General* list - semi-serious discussions about Humbug and ]
[ Unix-related topics. Please observe the list's charter. ]
[ Worthwhile understanding: http://www.humbug.org.au/netiquette.html ]
Mark Suter wrote:
| rick => Rick Phillips <rickp at universal.net.au>
| greg => Greg Black <gjb at humbug.org.au>
|
| rick> Pardon my ignorance but what is a "Zone File"
|
| greg> It's an expression used by people who think the Buggy Internet
| greg> Name Daemon is the only implementation of DNS software. The
| greg> expression refers to a type of data file used by that software.
|
| It is the *reference* implementation and the concept of a "zone" is
| explicit in the standards. Dan Bernstein uses the phrase "traditional
| traditional zone-file format" at the end of the following page.
|
| http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/tinydns-data.html
This is true, but even Paul Vixie does not believe that the zone
file format should ever have been standardised -- what happens
on the wire is a legitimate topic for standards, but the data
file format is not (think sql databases, in memory data, etc.).
Here's a recent quote from Vixie on the IETF's namedroppers list
(which should be required reading for people interested in this
topic):
some known DNS implementations do not parse "zone file
format" at all, preferring to take all of their zone data in
the form of RFC2136 dynamic updates.
i agree with randy (second time this year): standardizing
zone file format was always silly, and gets sillier every
year.
If Vixie think like that, I'm happy to agree with him -- and
we're far from being alone on this.
Greg
--
* This is list (humbug) general handled by majordomo at lists.humbug.org.au .
* Postings to this list are only accepted from subscribed addresses of
* lists 'general' or 'general-post'.
More information about the General
mailing list