[H-GEN] What size swap space is optimum?
Webmaster
terranova at acenet.net.au
Tue Apr 24 04:52:37 EDT 2001
[ Humbug *General* list - semi-serious discussions about Humbug and ]
[ Unix-related topics. Please observe the list's charter. ]
[ Worthwhile understanding: http://www.humbug.org.au/netiquette.html ]
> > > Even with low memory and lots of swapping, any instruction
> > > sequence should surely proceed to completion this side of Xmas -
> > > correct?
> Actually not necessarilly correct. Most OS's with virtual memory
> subsystems can suffer from an OOM condition called thrashing. I suspect
> this is what you are suffering. Effectively what happens is that there
> is so little spare memory available that processes spend their entire
> time-slice in page faults trying to swap in enough of their pages to
> execute, in the process ensuring that the next process on the run queue
> is swapped out and will likewise be forced to spend it's time-slice
> swapping.
Aha! I suspected that something like this was going on.
> Ultimately the only solution to the problem is to provide more memory,
> or to use less. However you may see some improvements by increasing the
> amount of swap
Oh, Great! Being impecunious I was wanting technical justification for spending
MORE money on the d**ned box, and being lazy for doing ANOTHER bl***y install.
Looks like I'm stuck with both.
Thanks heaps, Guys,
Carl Adams.
#==========================================================#
| TerraNova
| The living planet
| www.home.acenet.net.au/terranova
#==========================================================#
--
* This is list (humbug) general handled by majordomo at lists.humbug.org.au .
* Postings to this list are only accepted from subscribed addresses of
* lists 'general' or 'general-post'.
More information about the General
mailing list