[H-GEN] A humbug WAN
Bruce Campbell
bc at thehub.com.au
Tue May 18 09:04:58 EDT 1999
(Note reply-to: being general at humbug.org.au vs Bruce Campbell <bc at thehub.com.au>)
On Mon, 17 May 1999, Rob Kearey wrote:
> Robert Brockway wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 16 May 1999 excal at kermit.humbug.org.au wrote:
>
> > > I think a little problem in using a packet radio network is depending on
> > > the location of some emember. ie.. they live in a ditch, they may not get
> > > line-of-sight to another reciever. If we are using a lower frequency
> > > transciever this shouldnt be a problem at all.. Finding free public
>
> > Yep, it is done with radio rather than microwave - lower bandwidth but
> > much better connection ability (ie, no line of sight req).
>
> Also - you Can't Afford Decent Microwave. Trust me on this.
And don't forget, You Can't Get Decent Repeater Sites Easily.
> You /will/ be using encryption (swan &c), won't you?
If you have control over both ends of the microwave/radio, you can
effectively set up a secure tunnel (just have the link being private IPs,
and then vpn over that.)
--==--
Bruce.
--
This is list (humbug) general handled by majordomo at lists.humbug.org.au .
Postings only from subscribed addresses of lists general or general-post.
More information about the General
mailing list