[H-GEN] Linux kernel 2.2 and RedHat 6.0 Stability

Frank Brand fbrand at uq.net.au
Tue Jun 8 23:58:52 EDT 1999


(Note reply-to: being general at humbug.org.au vs Frank Brand <fbrand at uq.net.au>)

Steve Elliott wrote:

> (Note reply-to: being general at humbug.org.au vs Steve Elliott <steve at virtuozo.com.au>)
>
> "Everist, Geoff" wrote:
> >
> > (Note reply-to: being general at humbug.org.au vs "Everist, Geoff" <everistg at switch.aust.com>)
> >
> > Heh...the Kernel that comes with RH6.0 is _not_ very stable. We just had
>
> >
>
> Been seeing a few probs with the kernel under rh6 - so would a person be
> better off with a prev version of rh if they were setting a machine up
> from scratch ?
>

Or a later version. I think for a newbie used to Win9X that Mandrake 6 (kernel 2.2.9) is a
better bet.... but it is early days for kernel 2.2.

I found RH 5.2 very reliable (Or Mandrak 5.3 if you like).


--
Frank Brand
E-mail: fbrand at uq.net.au
Home Page: http://www.uq.net.au/~zzfbrand




--
This is list (humbug) general handled by majordomo at lists.humbug.org.au .
Postings only from subscribed addresses of lists general or general-post.



More information about the General mailing list