[H-GEN] DAT Tape errors
Steve Elliott
steve at virtuozo.com.au
Mon Jul 5 23:51:14 EDT 1999
(Note reply-to: being general at humbug.org.au vs Steve Elliott <steve at virtuozo.com.au>)
Michael Anthon wrote:
>
> (Note reply-to: being general at humbug.org.au vs Michael Anthon <mca at tams.com.au>)
>
> It's a SONY DDS2 tape drive..
>
> Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 06 Lun: 00
> Vendor: SONY Model: SDT-5000 Rev: 3.30
> Type: Sequential-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02
>
> Oh, cool, I love Linux!! I spoke to the tape provider, it's written on a
> Unisys box apparently but the guy I spoke to didn't seem to know much about
> it technically.
>
> I thought of testing it with a blank tape also, but unfortunately I don't
> own a blank tape.....
>
> Cheers
So is that a different box to the one that the other tapes u have used
were written on ?I guess he doesn't know huh ? Maybe they've also
changed the tape device they wrote it with also, just to really confuse
the issue.
I've got an sdt-5000 here and have been down the track of using no swap
devices etc as per prev posting - what a fsck'er.
On the sgi, the /dev/mt dir has a number of different options 4 the tape
device - swap bytes, no swap bytes, variable block size etc. Does the
same thing happen on Linux ?
I have also seen I/o errors on some of my tar tapes - using the right
tape device as per prev post usually sorts 'em out - **usually**.
I think u need 2 find out if they have done anything different with the
way the tape was written - different hardware etc.
Ain't it fun ?
--
Regards,
Steve Elliott.
Support Manager
VirtuoZo Systems
WWW: http://www.virtuozo.com.au/
--
This is list (humbug) general handled by majordomo at lists.humbug.org.au .
Postings only from subscribed addresses of lists general or general-post.
More information about the General
mailing list