[H-GEN] Problems with Linux loopback interface
Mark Suter
mark at zwitterion.humbug.org.au
Mon Dec 6 06:15:22 EST 1999
[ Humbug *General* list - semi-serious discussions about Humbug and ]
[ Unix-related topics. Please observe the list's charter. ]
Folks,
On Mon, 6 Dec 1999, Martin Pool wrote:
> My next move would be to run ping and traceroute with the (-v ?) option
> to show all results: it would be interesting to see if you're getting
> ICMPs or errors, or if the packets are just disappearing. Also try
> running strace or tcpdump while running ping for similar reasons.
Here is a ping and the corresponding tcpdump. Any clue what
the double packet in the tcpdump means or what is causing
it? [Read on - I've found a partial answer.]
# ping -c 1 -v 127.0.0.1
PING 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from localhost (127.0.0.1): Echo Request
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=10.5 ms
--- 127.0.0.1 ping statistics ---
1 packets transmitted, 1 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 10.5/10.5/10.5 ms
# tcpdump -i lo
tcpdump: listening on lo
20:52:36.597347 localhost > localhost: icmp: echo request
20:52:36.597347 localhost > localhost: icmp: echo request
20:52:36.597506 localhost > localhost: icmp: echo reply
20:52:36.597506 localhost > localhost: icmp: echo reply
> As robk suggests, you may want to move to 2.2.13. Alternatively, keep
> the same configuration but move to an earlier kernel. Check through
> http://www.kt.opensrc.org/
All of the above tests have been conducted on 2.2.13, recently
compiled this afternoon. I had to do a little work to get
the raid patch to apply cleanly.
I have solved my problem, thanks to Jason Parker. The following
command solved my problem.
# rpm -hUv netkit-base-0.10-37.i386.rpm
Previously, I was using netkit-base-0.10-13.src.rpm. It appears
as though the problem was with ping, not the kernel. Have a
look at the changelog, as follows. Thanks to Jason Andrade
for the RPM service.
http://mirror.aarnet.edu.au/RPM/redhat/6.1/i386/netkit-base-0.10-37.i386.html
Yours sincerely,
-- Mark John Suter | I know that you believe you understand
suter at humbug.org.au | what you think I said, but I am not sure
PGP encryption is OK | you realise that what you heard is not
Ph: +61 4 1162 2316 | what I meant. anonymous
--
* This is list (humbug) general handled by majordomo at lists.humbug.org.au .
* Postings to this list are only accepted from subscribed addresses of
* lists 'general' or 'general-post'.
More information about the General
mailing list